Figure - Sequencing Platform Comparison
Choosing a platform by the question being asked.
flowchart TD Q{What is the question?} --> A[SNP-level relatedness<br/>outbreak typing] Q --> B[Complete genome<br/>plasmid structure] Q --> C[Rapid / field / bedside] Q --> D[Single gene confirmation] Q --> E[Community composition] A --> Ill[Illumina short reads<br/>high accuracy, cheap depth] B --> Hyb[Hybrid: Illumina + ONT/PacBio<br/>or PacBio HiFi alone] C --> ONT[Oxford Nanopore<br/>portable, real-time] D --> San[Sanger] E --> Meta[Shotgun metagenomics<br/>or 16S amplicon] Ill --> Out[[WGS Bioinformatics Pipeline]] Hyb --> Out ONT --> Out Meta --> Out2[[Metagenomics]]
Trade-off summary
| Need | Best fit |
|---|---|
| Lowest cost per base, best per-base accuracy | Illumina |
| Repeat resolution, circular plasmids | PacBio HiFi or ONT |
| Turnaround measured in hours, portability | ONT |
| One amplicon, definitive confirmation | Sanger |